
14
Nov
2008
Posted by Mihaela Lica as Public Relations
If you're new here, you may want to sign up for email alerts or to subscribe to my RSS feed.
I wrote a few articles emphasizing a fact some still debate: Google does have semantic functionality although they deny their interest in semantic search. Particularly the heads of the so called semantic search engines debate this, happily wearing the hat of an ignorant “we are alone” – translated “we are the only ones able to create a semantic search engine.” What many still don’t understand – and this is probably my fault for not being eloquent enough – is that I never called Google a “semantic search engine.” What I said is that, among other algorithms, Google does employ semantic technology. To those search engine gurus of you who emailed us, I hope this is clear now. And I am addressing this article especially to you, maybe this time you stop and listen.
I offered in these pages enough free advice to help you build an empire. I know for a fact you took this advice, but like most things “borrowed” ideas detached from the origin often lose strength in the translation. A simple given credit, if you think about it, would have produced even more idea refinements and new ideas.
No need to mention, I presume, the amount of work and passion my partner Phil Butler invested in supporting you guys. Has he ever received at least for the sake of the courtesy a “thank you” note? The things you take for granted are often the easiest things to lose. Losing the respect of your greatest supporters does cost – in the long term. Too bad you are too blinded by your own reflections to see what the world around you actually has to offer. It seems to me that you, like Narcissus once, are followed by the curse of the nymphs: “So may he himself love, and not gain the thing he loves.”
Yes, I am disappointed: your lack of courtesy and respect is what keeps you from becoming sovereigns. You want to beat Google and yet you fail understanding a basic principle of leadership…
You cannot become a leader in your industry if you don’t have what it takes.
What kind of a leader are you going to be – the kind who thinks he is the best?
Or will you be one of the very few greats
Who attributes success to the rest? (The Image of Leadership – John Schoolland)
Enough now, for I fear I waste my time again. Goethe once said: “If I accept you as you are, I will make you worse; however if I treat you as though you are what you are capable of becoming, I help you become that.” Yet I think you are not able to accept my help. You “borrow” it instead.
Once again, I have to prove a point, and once again I have to lead the horse to the water: “Google added sophisticated voice recognition technology to the company’s search software for the Apple iPhone.” You tell me what is more semantic than natural language. I quote more from the article published on “The New Your Times” online: users
“can place the phone to their ear and ask virtually any question, like “Where’s the nearest Starbucks?” or “How tall is Mount Everest?” The sound is converted to a digital file and sent to Google’s servers, which try to determine the words spoken and pass them along to the Google search engine.”
If you cannot understand what this means, you probably should re-evaluate your own concept of “semantics.”
13 Responses
Rob Jongschaap
November 14th, 2008 at 8:20 pm
1I agree: “Google does have semantic functionality”, the analysis of common search queries already requires a lot of semantics. For the version based upon voice recognition this will be even more.
BSWD
November 16th, 2008 at 11:22 pm
2Trying to become a leader in anything – even in a niche you are competing in – is tough, and requires lots of work and dedication. You must always be one step ahead of your competitors and innovation is key.
Roger Hamilton
November 17th, 2008 at 5:40 pm
3That is why Google is currently the top search engine and gaining market share every day. Like Apple, their growth from ground zero is pretty impressive. Look at iTunes – their a leader in the internet for music.
Mihaela Lica
November 17th, 2008 at 9:53 pm
4You are right, Rob. I expect the advocates of the “semantic search engines” will argue that Google still delivers results based on keywords. Their rationality will be: the question divided into keywords that are then sent to Google’s “inferior” bots – the bots analyze the keywords and return results which are actually not based on the real “meaning” of the question. In short: Google does not “understand” the question – it just approximates it.
For the users, the algorithms are irrelevant. The results matter and Google does offer the most relevant results – keywords or no keywords.
To be honest I now “ask” Google whenever I need to find something. For example: “how do cigarettes harm our health?” delivers very relevant results, and all other questions for that matter. If I compare with the “semantic” search engines, honestly… I see no difference.
For me a semantic search engine should be able to “answer back” and not to deliver a list of links with highlighted text that matches my query.
Mihaela Lica
November 17th, 2008 at 9:55 pm
5I think you miss the point of the article, BSWD. I am not trying to teach people how to become leaders – I am just reproaching the lack of respect and grace to some who think they are leaders. Roger fully got my point. Google knows how to play leader.
SEO GTA
November 18th, 2008 at 5:09 am
6Looking to how adsense work; showing ads based on keywords in Adwords
Looking also the tilde modifier
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz=1B3GGGL_enCA261CA261&q=~job&btnG=Search
All shows that Google can semantically analyze content, so why not to use this in the SERP
Dave
November 19th, 2008 at 6:04 pm
7Don’t believe Google, they have their fingers in many pies.
Mihaela Lica
November 19th, 2008 at 6:38 pm
8No one believes Google, Dave. But believing has nothing to do with the fact that, at least in search, they are leaders.
Prevodi
November 19th, 2008 at 7:00 pm
9Google is really great. I believe the best part is yet still to come. In the last couple of years Google increased the number o services and is going to continue this way. Amazon is probably worth a mention here too.
Mihaela Lica
November 20th, 2008 at 10:52 am
10Except that Amazon doesn’t give you anything for free.
GearModa
November 25th, 2008 at 9:57 pm
11Google never ceases to amaze me, I think that although they are involved in many different sectors, I think they do the right thing in pushing continued innovation and improvement i whatever they involve themselves in.
Future wealth
November 29th, 2008 at 7:58 am
12Google is in top for their searches compared to all other search engines. They are doing their part correctly. They can answer our questions at any time. Hats off to Google!!!
Mike King
January 11th, 2009 at 12:46 am
13I agree with the example listed of Google’s ability to adapt this kind of freely demanded and semantic search. They have enabled more features within a single search than probably the rest of the search engines combined.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
previous post: Getting Published with a Little Help from My Friends
next post: How to Write Compelling SEO Copy
to top of page...