Allen Stern, editor at CenterNetworks wrote yesterday about an interesting local startup – ZocDoc. The news refers mainly at ZocDoc’s round A of funding from Khosla Ventures, but what really caught my attention was Allen’s statement:
While ZocDoc isn’t as “sexy” as some of the other startups out there, it is one of the most useful out there today.
Although I read CenterNetworks often I don’t comment, yet this time I couldn’t help but wonder: “what’s a sexy startup?”
Then it hit me! Twitter was a sexy startup, FriendFeed was a sexy startup, Disqus is a sexy startup, Digg, Mixx, StumbleUpon, Last.fm and basically everything that (according to Allen) “makes bloggers talk and post about all day” are or were sexy startups.
The more I think about it, the more clear it becomes to me that Allen is right. The herd mentality of some of the top leaders of the blogosphere is what hurts startups like ZocDoc the most. A Scoble rants about how no one needs PR and suddenly his servers go on fire. I count 64 comments today on his entry endorsing StackOverflow for what I’d call a disguised promotion of the service and I have reasons to believe that “StackOverflow” will soon be added at the list of sexy startups just because Scoble said so. I don’t argue the value of StackOverflow as a service for programmers, but how is this type of service making a difference in our lives anyway? What is the real value it will bring on the web, other that the value it will bring in a very narrow niche – that of the web developers? Of course it takes a skilled developer to make the UI and the platform for a service like ZocDoc, but shouldn’t we give these startups at least equal coverage if not equal chances?
ZocDoc doesn’t even catch the eye of a Scoble, but it does catch the eye of the brilliant Kristen Nicole, who does cover the news on Mashable. I mention Mashable because this is another hub for “sexy startups.” If you compare the response to Kristen’s coverage of ZocDoc to the response Don Reisinger got for his article about Grooveshark, you’ll easily understand what “sexy” startup is all about.
Of course there are plenty of bloggers writing about ZocDoc’s breakthrough, but most of them are employed by specialty publications like VentureBeat, Silicon Alley Insider, The New York Times’ DealBook, Cnet and a few others. Although I searched I couldn’t find the news covered by ordinary bloggers, you know, those bloggers who actually make the “sexy” startups famous, those second and third tier bloggers who write about Twitter almost daily, either reviewing a service flaw or bragging about their number of followers. This is somehow sad and it makes me realize that we do prefer “sexy” over value.
Some will argue that Twitter, Digg, FriendFeed and the like do provide value for the community helping people connect faster, helping companies spread the news to a targeted audience and so on. I have to agree that this is partially true. As a former Twitter and Digg user though, I have to say that the “sexy” services are merely a waste of time. Twitter is flooded by “my cat pooped” type of messages and Digg users seem to promote all nonsense under the sun. All fine, but there are also those who seem to dedicate their lives to burying all news that try to promote something of value. A ZocDoc article will never make it to the first page at Digg. I challenge you to prove me wrong.
I have to agree, sexy is out. Of course when sites like digg and twitter become main-stream…are they not sexy any more as a result? Its a repedative pattern. Some one comes up with an awesome idea…it gets beat to death and then google and any body else, discount the authority of what comes from the once great site.
I’m still trying to make up my mind about Twitter. When I joined, I was very skeptical. But through Twitter I have met a few very good blogger connections, found some job opportunities and a number of excellent ideas for blogging and marketing. If you filter out the extraneous stuff, and there are tools like TweetDeck to help you do that, Twitter can be useful.
Well, Brad, it also depends on the people in the network, the “friends and followers” – for example I used to follow Yaro who considered very important to let everyone know about his travel habits. OK, let’s say this was useful since it explained why he was not available for twits for one or two hours. But then… other people sharing their morning habits (one coffee with three sugars, etc) really made the twitter experience less worthy. Couldn’t filter them, some are actually people I admire and respect and it is always amazing how much time they spent ranting. If conversation means pointless ranting, then we are all in trouble.
As I said, I don’t deny twitter’s “community value” – I just state that there are other things that deserve our attention. And I have Allen to thank for pointing that out.