12
Jul
2008
Posted by Mihaela Lica as Featured
I am far from being perfect and I am perfectly aware of my often pointless rambles. There is however a trend that worries me, a flagellum I’d dare call it, that makes me wonder why are we wasting our time with nonsense?
If you are a social media user, if you are a member of StumbleUpon, Mixx, digg or any other similar network, I am sure you get a number of “shouts” each day. You vote because this is the “social” thing to do. After all, those who send you the shouts reciprocate… Or do they? Whether they reciprocate or not, is not the matter now. The matter is what they send.
From all the sites you have to vote on, from all the sites you push forward in an act of kindness, how many are truly relevant and how many deserve your thumbs up?
How do web pages with three or four lines of content, cluttered with Google Ads, banners and commercial crap, get so popular? Why do we make it possible for mediocrity to “steal our thunder?”
Are those who create such pages inapt of writing something better or are they simply lazy? I cannot really link to examples of what I am talking about, because I don’t want to offend anyone, but those who send such links already know what I mean.
To become a top stumbler all you have to do is to “discover” new sites, new articles, new pictures and videos every day. To be “active” as they say. There are no guidelines of quality. It doesn’t matter what you discover. Just use the Stumble toolbar and keep Stumble “active.” Of course, there are some “don’t promote your own site” rules (as if Stumble really knows which is your website or how many you own) and “don’t spam.” How do you know when you “spam” anyway? There is no real objective definition of “spam.” For SEO haters any SEO article submitted to Stumble, digg or anywhere else is spam. SEO haters don’t even bother to read such articles. They will always “thumb down” anything that even “smells” like SEO.
Scrapper websites that get the maximum number of votes at Stumble are spam too, but no one seems to notice that. Scrapper sites are generated with software like AutoBlogged and other automatic content generators.
Sometimes we “vote” for an image, probably stolen or bought from a high-profile photography site, an image that is surrounded by ads. Somehow we manage to ignore that that image was only submitted to Stumble to drive traffic to a site. How is this valuable for the community?
Last but not least… the pointless discoveries. Here I will give examples, because I “thumbed up” the nonsense and I am as guilty as everyone else. For example: Cut and paste one line of code to make any website editable. I can see the “fun” in this, but I fail to understand the point. Judge for yourself:
Of course you can’t actually edit the actual web page but you can edit the page as you see it on your screen.
Now why on earth would you want to do that? I mean… how bored are you? Can’t you find something better to do online?
Luckily, the authors of the article tell us the “real purpose” of such a tool:
This is one of the ways scammers create fake screenshots, fake Adsense & affiliate earnings and even fake Paypal transactions.
I could give you many other examples of pointless online activities, but wouldn’t be a “waste of time” creating such a list? Instead of occupying my time with such activities, I’ll tell you what to do if you are truly bored of voting for nonsense.
I don’t want to make a list of “offline” activities you could get involved into. I suppose it’s pretty clear that Web boredom can be effectively fought outdoors.
To make a long story short: let’s do something less for the sites that promote rubbish and something more for meaningful resources. No matter how bored we are, let’s no longer push forward the scrapper sites and all those who negatively impact quality online.

13 Responses
TDMV
July 12th, 2008 at 4:06 pm
1My sentiments exactly, Mig! The socalled ’social media’ get abused; there’s little social about them. My guess is that many -if not most- ‘users’ on places like Stumbleon, are not real. I can understand it’s hard to spot them, or eliminate them, but if we don’t make a conscious effort, then these places will go down sooner or later.
Theo (a.k.a. Yinepu)
grand*ma
July 12th, 2008 at 6:14 pm
2Frankly, my dear, I get punch drunk with the many submissions and beggers wanting my approval for submissions by both Digg, Mixx, and SU. How I have been coping with these things is by ignoring them. It is probably not in the most socially acceptable manner but oh well. My escape is that I turn the computer off for another time. Plus that, I’ve disengaged Digg’s shouts. Most of the stuff I’ve seen on Digg is absolutely useless and pointless ’stuff’ to me anymore. And on the same note, I’ve found myself getting very disappointed with the number of really crappy submissions by attention seekers. It’s as if they’re screaming, “Look at me! Look at Me!” (yawn…)
My brain’s circuitry is burned out with information overload. It’s very similar to the spammers and the “Vote for me!” mentalities we met at BTF. Geez, what a nightmare that turned out to be. I don’t care to be glued to this computer. After all, I own it. It doesn’t own me.
Just color me, “Burned out.” I’ve had enough of this form of socializing for the time being.
^5!
Lillie Ammann
July 13th, 2008 at 2:30 am
3Mig,
You make me feel better about not participating in social media. I keep hearing how important it is… and thinking I should get involved. You’re right - there are many more worthwhile activities to occupy our time.
Mihaela Lica
July 13th, 2008 at 1:47 pm
4Oh, Theo… your first comment on my blog.
I am honored.
I know what you mean… yes, it is hard to spot them, but I usually only respond to people I already know and “block user” when I get messages like “hi” “hello” “I added you, add me” - etc. I did vote for stories I didn’t like in the past, but enough is enough. I will no longer “thumb up” rubbish. Also, I’ve decided to say goodbye to digg. I find the communities at Propeller and Stumble more “mature” and valuable. Look at you, for example. We met at Stumble and so far the “exchange” of links and messages was always valuable, at least for me. Or Rob (rjj) - he always sends the coolest links, to topics I really like: search, LEDs, web issues. Quite often he inspired me to write various articles. users like you guys make me believe that there is still a chance for these social networks to keep their value.
Mihaela Lica
July 13th, 2008 at 1:59 pm
5MA, isn’t it ironic that I’ve submitted this entry to Stumble myself?
I want people to “look at me me me me” - to see that I will no longer stumble crap.
I personally disabled all shouts from digg and mixx. I get no emails from Stumble either - I chose to visit my mailbox there when I have time. The toolbar is not intrusive.
It’s a form of social networking that brought us together, MA - blogging to fame as far as I remember. That was also something good to start with, but got bad as people abused it. How do we fight these things? How do we prevent a good network from going bad?
Mihaela Lica
July 13th, 2008 at 2:01 pm
6Actually, Lillie, the quality of your work should be in the spot light. Sites like yours suffer because of the low quality submissions that invade the social networks. No one sees the diamonds in the mud…
Richard
July 14th, 2008 at 7:15 pm
7Participating in social media is not my priorities too. But thank’s for your advice and explanation.
Amy
July 14th, 2008 at 8:53 pm
8Web boredom SUCKS!!
grand*ma
July 14th, 2008 at 11:29 pm
9Once I met all of you at BTF, and you for a second time, I removed my BTF entry. Intuitively, I knew that I didn’t need to pursue it any longer because I won the contest when I met “the group.” The rest became unimportant to me.
I think we’re doing a bang up job with how we are both managing this very overwhelming ’social’ stuffola. I’ve become asocial as a result of all the hooplah. Furthermore, I’ve adapted to it very well, too!
As always I remain,
Sincerely,
The Happy Recluse
ps: ^5!
~:o)
Craig
July 15th, 2008 at 8:53 am
10I think that social media is highly overused and overrated at the moment. People seem to be sinking loads of time (and therefore money) into it for reasons that are unknown or at least abstract to them.
Has anyone out there actually amde a crap load of money by spamming social networking sites? I don’t think so because most of the people who surf them are doing the same thing and you can’t trick a tricker.
I do use a few sites but I only update them maybe once or twice a month and I definitely only bookmark sites or pages that have genuinely impressed me. Sadly these kind of efforts just get buried in spam.
Mihaela Lica
July 15th, 2008 at 9:08 am
11@Richard - I am not against social media. I am just trying to say: let’s bring value to the community instead of trying to “cheat the system”
Social media is very valuable for many businesses and it is actually what the Web is all about. The moment you launch a site you become a part of this media. The moment you leave a comment on a blog/ forum, you display social behavior.
Mihaela Lica
July 15th, 2008 at 9:11 am
12@Amy: Amen!
@MA - yeah, that was my win too.
I remember back then I had one of the most popular blogs in that network and I was also the first to write about BTF, announcing it at eWritings, so you can imagine my sadness when I saw the “decay” of something with so much potential. But the “sadness” didn’t last long. I got you by my side, Pearl and Deborah… and I couldn’t be happier!
Mihaela Lica
July 15th, 2008 at 9:16 am
13Craig, you’d be surprised! There are many people making money by spamming social networks. Some get paid to spam, the spammers get clicks on their sites loaded with malware… of course spamming works.
Ad powered sites increase their revenue based on the number of “page impressions” as well. Many bloggers get their high Alexa rankings by social media submissions. Alexa rankings are important for advertisers who believe that the blog is “popular”… and so on, and so on.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
previous post: A World of Colors and Meanings
next post: Delver, the Social Search Engine
to top of page...