however we have to admit that blinkx is having a great technology in place and it is the biggest video search engine in the world right now. they are hoovering on a daily basis all the net…their monetization system works better than anyone’s else. small company but very dynamic and innovative.
my opinion is that google (or a big player) will acquire them soon and it would be definately a wise move.

I’m not, but the way. The author’s name, prominently displayed at the top of the text, is Julette Garside, and my name’s Gordon. Or do you think I’ve gone in and added that too? Is it possible you just missed it first time round and made up a load of guff in your indignance?

Best,

Murray

Interesting, I read the resident article before it was changed and there was no “indeed” in the text, nor should there be if this were the original text. Why indeed? As far as talking through a hat, I think someone else should put their thinking cap on and click their heels…perhaps the Telegraph will come back in style and we can tap out signals to one another at 10mbs.

I will never cease to be amazed that people in such positions can never absorb just criticism. It is as if you think Mihaela is doing this out of spite rather than honestly trying to point things in the right direction. We are certainly not the “keepers of the gate” when it comes to all things Internet, but it should be painfully obvious that you guys sure as hell don’t need to be.

I think her problem is shared by many of us. We are tired of divisive companies bending the universe. When will someone just spend as much money making something of actual value as they do forcing people to believe what is often BS. As PR people, the general perception is that we do this very thing, but anyone who has even a pea for a brain knows that at the end of the day..there has to be something in the glass slipper.

Changing an article to include “indeed” Telegraph after the fact….would they do that?

Always, Phil

The Telegraph article is clearly promoting Pixsta and Blinkx – they are featured first, on the main page of the article, whereas everything else is pushed on page 2 where not many would venture to read. Personally I don’t care that Telegraph is promoting its sponsors, but make sure the disclaimers are visible and don’t misinform the public about the other search engines.

I can’t see any claim that they’re all UK companies, or that they’re all going after Google’s core business. In fact, that’s exactly what the article says they’re not doing, but they’re search-related enterprises approaching areas of computing from another way.

What’s your problem, exactly?