19
May
2007
She is one of the many children in the world being abducted. We are not aware of the rest. No one seems to talk about them (and that for a good reason, as you will read below) with so much passion.
They are shadows on a wall, images on the milk boxes: the omnipresent question, “Have you seen this child?”
And the media burns.
She smiles with her innocent smile on thousands of web pages. Her eyes, mirrors of purity, dig deep into our souls. They make us aware. They make us pray. Not just for her: for all the kids sharing the same fate.
Who has this little girl? Who kidnapped her and is crazy enough to believe he/she (or maybe they) will get away with it?
In my opinion this was a carefully planned abduction. It happened in Portugal because that’s the easiest target. In a country which in the past 17 years had no abductions records, who would have thought about the possibility of not seeing a child anymore?
So back to the question: have you seen this child? Do you know where this little girl might be?
I know she is not where I live – this is a small village where everybody knows your name.
She could be in Germany because nobody here will pay attention to a little blond girl, no matter how cute. Most oft the German kids are blond. All kids are cute.
She could be in your town.
Or she could be three miles away from the place where she was abducted.
But with all this fuss, do you honestly think that the kidnapers will be stupid enough to bring her to a public place?
I’ll tell you what I think: the publicity is wrong. This child is not missing because she lost her way. She was kidnapped. That means that publicity might scare the kidnapper(s).
In the most fortunate scenario, they’ll abandon the little girl somewhere (and in this case media involvement to identify the child makes sense).
But in the worst scenario, which, excuse my frankness, is also the most probable one, the kidnappers will get scared and kill the child. Don’t get me wrong. I pray that this doesn’t happen. But I am a former military journalist and I have a bit of military training, enough to be able to decide what to publish and when. When the news endangers a human life – and in this case the life of a child – is it OK to continue the ramble?
Is it OK to create a website mirrored on different domains for the child? Is it OK to use her as a publicity tool?
So I’m asking you: what do you think about this story? I know the child has your prayers. I know you believe in God, and I know you have hope. My question is not about your feelings for the child. Only a crazy person would attack the child. Opinions about the parents are also irrelevant. But what do you think about the media? Doesn’t it look to you that they lost their mind and instead of making things better they just endanger the girl?
Is the hunger for sensational really so great that we need a drama of such proportions to feed it?
No, I don’t need to spell a name. You know it! And if you think posting her picture and her name on your blog would help, do it. We can only do what we think it’s best, in good faith. But it’s not OK to harass the family, to hunt them down, to judge their lives, to use their other children for the sensational. That’s not OK!
5 Responses
Paul
May 19th, 2007 at 12:52 pm
1Hi again Mig, this is a very thoughtful and important blog. You raise some very difficult issues. I hope some people read your blog and perhaps, just perhaps they catch sight of Madeleine. The Once again thanks for your concern.
best regards
laura
May 19th, 2007 at 3:04 pm
2Hi Mihaela,
Where I am they publicize an abduction like this as soon as it occurs. The reasoning behind the publicity is that they want to get the child back as quickly as possible. Therefore, we have what is called an “Amber Alert,” (so named after a little girl who was abducted and killed about ten years ago).
Apparently, statistics show that if a child is returned in the first 24 hours after they are taken they are much more likely to be unharmed. It seems to work. Some children (not all) are returned safely. People do call in as a result of seeing the child’s photo.
I am concerned for this little girl’s safety and my heart goes out to her parents. It appears that she has been missing for over a week. That is not good at all. This matter is definitely in my prayers.
Mihaela Lica
May 19th, 2007 at 3:21 pm
3Hi Laura,
I know about the Amber Alert - we have it here too not with the same name, but it’s there, and there’s something similar in Romania as well. But: the Amber Alert is not the same thing with what happens now.
The media abuses the victimized family. They use the event as a tool to increase popularity, number of viewers… whatever. They hunt the poor parents everywhere. They point fingers, accuse, torment.
This little girl is missing since more than two weeks. I hope she is still alive, but as long as the media watches, the kidnappers will keep a low profile. And we need the kidnappers to make a mistake.
The publicity is really wrong and it doesn’t seem to stop. Because they have nothing to publish, they even started to use the other kids of the McCanns. I’d like to believe this is a good strategy. But the statistics, even those you mentioned, tell other things. I am afraid that Maddie will end up being another unsolved case.
And that’s sad! It’s also sad that people don’t know when to stop. This reminds me of the VT case, when a murderer was turned into a media hero. Instead of talking about the victims and the grief, the media was hunting the sensational and promoting human trash.
What a real journalist should do is move his ass on the tracks of the kidnappers and try to find out the truth: interview the witnesses, think, perform a little detective work. Sorry, I am really pissed off about this.
Lillie Ammann
May 20th, 2007 at 10:11 am
4Mig,
I really lthink we often don’t get news or helpful information from the media. We get the sensational, the stories that advance some agenda of the media, coverage that glorifies evil and casts insinuations on anyone if they think it will attract ratings/viewers/readers …
This is only one of countless situations where the media makes situations worse instead of better. Continuous coverage of the VA Tech shootings and other events like it lead to more tragedies because disturbed individuals see they can become “famous” by destroying other people.
Of course, there are responsible journalists and many in the media probably believe they are performing a service. But unfortunately, I’m afraid you’re right about this case and many more.
Mihaela Lica
May 20th, 2007 at 3:32 pm
5Yes, the VT case really will lead at such an effect, Lillie! Harming people is easy. It’s not easy to do something that matters. It’s not easy to love.
Like you, I believe that there are responsible journalists, but they have to do what they are being paid for. I remember myself almost getting fired for refusing a task. The good thing is that I could afford to say no. I was young, had no family and my financial situation was secure. But other journalists cannot say no. I believe some know what they are doing. I believe they know it’s wrong. But they have no other choice… Or do they?
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
previous post: Not Another How to Write Press Releases Article… Or…
next post: Buy and Sell Domains
to top of page...