07
Feb
2007
Posted by Mihaela Lica as Advertising, News, Public Relations
A title from the Telegraph.co.uk announced last year: “Downloading violent porn to be punished with jail” (especially downloading children pornography). The amazing part is that this law was given in the UK as a result of a tireless campaign started by a woman who lost her daughter because of violent Internet pornography. More precisely: the young Jane Longhurst was killed in 2003 by Graham Coutts who was addicted to violent online porn.
Jane’s mother, Liz Longhurst started then a campaign to determine the UK government make possession of violent pornography materials illegal both online and offline. And her fight was not in vain. One person. One voice. One 75 years old woman driven by love and sorrow for her lost child.
The Telegraph.co.uk announces today: Thousands caught in Austrian child porn sting. Among the 2360 people around the world discovered through an investigation conducted by the Austrian police, 72 come from Britain. Scary numbers? Well, we’ll redefine “scary” in a bit:
Suspects from more than 77 countries have been identified as logging on to the material.The 23 suspects from Austria, who range from 17 to 69 years of age, have been called in for questioning but there have been no arrests yet. A police spokesman said he expected warrants to be issued soon.
Investigations are continuing in Britain and Russia to discover who uploaded and filmed the videos.Guenther Platter, the Austrian interior minister, said that the material was of the “worst kind of child sexual abuse” where girls could be seen being raped, and you could also hear screams.
These girls were five years of age. Scary? Yes, indeed.
Whether children pornography as in the example described above, or we are dealing with cases when children accidentally (or not) stumble upon explicit adult materials (videos, pictures, texts) while browsing the Web, one thing is sure: pornography and childhood don’t belong in the same universe. Pornography, related to children in any form, is bad! Unfortunately they have to coexist in the same universe. The Web knows no borders.
I am going to be horribly frank: it’s our fault. Honestly! I am not talking about violent pornography anymore. I talk about pornography in general. We are consumers, and if we are not consumers, we just sit around and tolerate a pretty scary phenomenon (I’ll get to the point, just stick with me for a while!). Let’s face it: as adults watch porn, either online or offline. And I am not saying there’s something wrong with that. After all, each has his/her own sexual preferences, but do they need to be so “open”?
You don’t need to admit it publicly, but here comes the question: have you ever watched a very explicit adult video online for free? If you did, was the access to that video
You’ll probably answer “a” – easy. Because this is what happens on the Web now: everyone has easy, free access to explicit adult materials. And by everyone I mean children, teenagers and adults. And by children I mean… probably your children!
It’s my personal belief that we cannot stop pornography. The porn industry is one of the most powerful and rich in the world. But I do believe that we can show civic consciousness and do something to slow down this industry. We can do something to prevent our children especially those really young – from 5 to 11 for example – from accidental exposure to online porn.
To forbid their access to the Internet is not the solution. I am sure you already know why. Another problem is that families with low income cannot afford to buy software like NetNanny and there’s no such software available for free (do post a link in your comments if you know one!). Purchasing spy software to learn what the kids do online is not the solution either: first because invading their privacy might cause behavioral problems, and second because you cannot control them everywhere.
As long as the porn websites are so “open”, showing free “demo” videos on their landing pages to “tempt” their visitors into making accounts and becoming paying customers, there’s always a chance for kids to stumble upon porn, even when searching for info on their favorite pop stars – Britney Spears for example (it’s not that Briteny Spears is a porn star, but the porn webmasters use her name as a keyword). Or when they look for info to complete their homework. Did you know that the term “goddess” might lead to a domina site?
So this is what we are going to do. Together with one of the most powerful PR voices I know – Jon Harmon, author of Force for Good, we are going to start a campaign that will somehow “slow down” the porn industry: Blogger Power: Safeguard the Web for Children. We have a pretty good idea of how this might work and we are going to share everything with you as soon as we have all the details of the plan in place. We already have some supporters and we are going to contact any VIPs we know to sustain this project. But in the meanwhile we are waiting for your best ideas on what could the bloggers do to protect the innocent.
Remember: this campaign will be based on your power. On bloggers’ power. So far it is pretty clear what bloggers can do: we join communities. We are ready to get paid to blog, or paid to publish advertisements from companies we don’t even care about. It doesn’t matter… The point is: we blog! We have voices! We have the power to publish our opinions freely and no one can really influence them and stop us from speaking! So let’s all say the same thing. All at once.
As you see, my blog is about SEO and PR. This is what I do, this is who I am. You are probably blogging about celebrities, or your own dog, or clothes and fashion. It doesn’t matter what you blog about! You still have a voice. You still have readers. You can make a difference! So make your voice heard. Post your thoughts about this campaign here or on Jon’s blog. We count on you. Without you it will be more difficult to convince the offline media to react and to make the politicians take serious, common sense measures.
26 Responses
Mario
February 8th, 2007 at 1:49 pm
1what can i say about this… i have nothing against pornography, as long as it happens in MY bedroom
. no, my voice you have. it is time that somebody starts going against it. i hope you get some good reactions about it and that it helps/changes something. it is really not ok as it is at the moment…
Steve
February 8th, 2007 at 5:12 pm
2Great article, extremly well written. I totally agree - loved it!
Mihaela Lica
February 8th, 2007 at 5:14 pm
3Thank you, Steve! I hope to see a similar entry on your blog as well!
Alex
February 10th, 2007 at 4:16 am
4Good idea, Mig! I’ll “make my voice heard”.
Mihaela Lica
February 10th, 2007 at 7:31 pm
5Alex, is this your idea of fun? http://www.stylegala.com/news/public200702/2617.htm#comments
I told you I am going to contact people myself if necessary. Please STOP submitting my stuff!
A
February 24th, 2007 at 9:24 am
6This is great; to be honest i didn’t understand this issue completely until i had my first nephews, little cute girls. The older one is already navigating with (i hope) the watching of their parents.
But you know what? there should be also a warning for all the parents… If they have enough money to pay for the internet service, they should be able also to consider and pay for a way to restrict the access to those kind of content, by using a software like you said or etc.
English is not my native language, but I’m in. (o.o)b
Mihaela Lica
February 24th, 2007 at 2:36 pm
7Great to know you are in. English is not my native language either. You could blog in any language you want. We hope this will become a global campaign.
You are right about warning the parents, but no matter how hard the parents might try, they cannot control everything the kids do. I think the porn industry should show some concern. In a time when governments forbid smoking in public places and access to violent games, free porn online seems to me … out of place. I mean free open porn. For all to see… Kids are fragile. Let’s protect their innocence in every possible way.
Jose
February 28th, 2007 at 7:36 am
8Hello Mihaela,
I just wanted to comment briefly to let you know that I’ve posted an entry in support of your effort to protect the innocence of children. Thanks for the opportunity to help raise awareness about an important topic.
Jose
Mihaela Lica
February 28th, 2007 at 9:42 am
9Thank you, Jose! I’ll add your name and entry to the bloggers page on Blogger Power: Safeguard the Web for Children blog.
Jose
February 28th, 2007 at 2:00 pm
10Thanks Mihaela.
Alex Boone
March 2nd, 2007 at 11:26 pm
11I appreciate you strong position on this issue and I’m in full support of the prosecution of crime. But what are we really talking about here? Is the issue pornography or are we talking about sexual predators and sexual crimes. There is a distinct difference. Pornography is defined as the explicit representation of the human body or sexual activity with the goal of sexual arousal. This in itself is not necessarily harmful. It is only when an individual uses sex for the purpose to exploit or bring to another is when it becomes a crime. The internet just gives these sexual predators another place to solicit and exploit our children. They can do this in the total absence of pornography in fact many sexual predators use chat room intended for children to do their dirty work.
When I here such a strong position with regards to things of a sexual nature it sounds more like we have the intention of policing morality. Morality is an individuals personal right of choice. I think the real issue is not pornography at all but an issue of crime and we do need to protect our children from crime all crime not just crimes sexual in nature. However we do need to stay focused on the real issue of crime and not just the tools of the criminal.
Keep in mind as we protect our children from sexually based crime; we also have a responsibility to teach out children how to develop a healthy out look on sex. How could we ever expect our children to develop a healthy out look on sex when all they’ve been taught is that sex is wrong, bad, dirty, nasty, filthy, painful and simply don’t do it. It is my belief that some sexually predators where children who might not have received proper educated about sex and wasn’t give any guidance with how do deal with the issues of sex or how to deal with their own sexual desires. I strongly feel that education is the key to solving this problem. I know for many sex is a sensitive subject and have concerns about our children being exposed to it too early, but the reality is that we don’t expose our children to sex, nature does and it happens around puberty. Our children need us to comfort and educate them during this new phase of life.
Let’s equip our children with the most powerful weapon against crime and tool of life, knowledge.
You can go to blog.trieditmyself.com to see more of my comments regarding this topic.
Mihaela Lica
March 3rd, 2007 at 8:22 am
12Thank you so much for taking your time to write the comment: I agree with you on many of the points.
I was not talking about sexual predators. When I think of them, I feel helpless. I was talking indeed about pornography - extreme pornography if you want. As I said, I am not against pornography in general, as an adult. Each has the freedom to express himself/ herself sexually as he/she wants. But do we all need to know about each other’s sexual preferences? And are you sure that kids need to know about things like sexual torture, gang-bang, domina sites, sexual submission and so on? Are you really sure we have to tell our kids that these are healthy sexual behaviours?
Let’s make a difference, shall we? Erotica is one thing. Extreme pornography is another… Some “dungeons” are legal sites. And they offer free tours. I could send you some links, if you want. You have to understand, I do research a lot on this issue. And I don’t always like what I see.
Once again, please don’t miss my point: pornography is a matter of choice. If an adult chooses to buy a pornographic magazine he/she doesn’t need to first see what’s inside. We all know what is inside. The paper or plastic wraper doesn’t stop the consumers from buying. Sex shops don’t expose sexual toys in the window, yet clients still go in, because they know what is inside. How is a password protected login going to harm the industry?
Let’s stop saying it’s only the parents’ duty to educate kids. Let’s stop trying to skip our responsibilities. And let’s give our children a pure universe to grow. Sexual education has its place in time and it is a must! But it has no place when a child is 5,6, 8, 9 years old!
As you say: if we don’t expose our children to sex, nature does and it happens around puberty. I think puberty is the right time to talk about sex with our children and not kindergarden! What do you think?
Rach
March 4th, 2007 at 8:40 am
13I read about the posts of fellow bloggers Yvonne, Jose and Laura and they have led me to your site. Thank you for this noteworthy campaign. As a mother, I agree that we should protect our innocent children from dangerous web content especially pornography.
I support this noble cause. Good luck!
Owen
March 6th, 2007 at 1:43 pm
14Hmm .. I can see where they’re coming from; but I’m not quite sure I agree with the sentiment of the campaign above. Would YOU password-protect your blog to make sure it’s only visible to a closed community? I wouldn’t, and wouldn’t expect other people to do it either.
Let us say, for the sake of argument, a webmaster DID password-protect his/her website; how would he/she know who to give the password to? Would you expect someone wanted access to post them a notarised copy of their birth certificate?
If under-18s want to get onto their website, they will anyway; I remember how ingenious I was as a curious teenager … I prefer focusing on educating my children, rather than trying to keep them in a padded cell to make sure they don’t hurt themselves.
A friend once told me that raising a child is like having a butterfly in your hand. You don’t want to open it, for fear that the beautiful creature will fly away. But if you hold it to tight, and don’t give it enough sunlight, the pretty butterfly will perish and die. Give your kids their due, they are might brighter than you think!
Mihaela Lica
March 6th, 2007 at 1:49 pm
15Owen, I’ve already answered your comment on Blogger Power. Yes, I would password protect my blog if its contents would be harmful for children!
I really don’t think that BDSM, gang bang, domina sites and so on should be “open”. I don’t expect “a birth certificate”. I just say: it will be more difficult for kids (note: kids not teens) to access the sites and we’ll avoid dramatic accidents that lead to this awful story!
SteveMD
March 13th, 2007 at 6:05 pm
16Well to the first article, violent pornography does not generate monsters.
As for the case mentioned, the verdict was overturned by the high court and there is now a retrial. This may well have been a murder, but it is clear the accused man was involved in asphyxiation before he had access to the internet.
There are a wealth of studies, over many decades, on the effects of this material on the viewer and non can show any evidence that viewing such adult material causes the viewer to commit crimes.
Child pornography is already legislated against and that legislation has wordwide cooperation.
International cooperation has been unaninmously refused for the law banning possession of extreme adult porn.
Pornography is not bad, it is merely a form of entertainment that focuses on sexuality, perhaps not in a realistic way, but it is meant to be fantasy material.
Exposure to pornography by children must be limited by both law and protective measures of the parents.
Whilst I would fully support any move to pressure porn site owners to put all their material behind age-restricted barriers, I would doubt if that would gain universal compliance from site owners, but it may help.
Any attempt to censor the internet is doomed to failure, even the Chinese governement which throws huge amounts of money and manpower at its own censorship of the net is failing and its efforts are being bypassed on a large scale. Proxy servers and mass user peer to peer networks are already in place and working. Added to that much online material can be delivered to mobile phones.
The UK is attempting internet censorship itself with its ‘cleanfeed’ system meant to be running by the end of 2007. But it is already obsolete and it is not yet in place!
The only way to keep children from seeing porn online is a combination of filtering software and monitoring their activities by parents.
I’m sorry, but parents must simply stop seeing the internet as the latest ‘electronic nanny’.
If you took your child to the beach, watched them enter the sea and walked away, you would be, rightly, accused of dangerous neglect. It is the same with the internet, it is not TV, it is not a games console, it is not inherently evil, it is a wide-open ocean of information and sometimes sharks swim in it.
Mihaela Lica
March 13th, 2007 at 6:08 pm
17Agree with you at most of the points, except nr 1! How would you call a man who rapes a 5 years old? Or better: how would you call a man (or woman) who pays to see something like this online?
SteveMD
March 13th, 2007 at 7:39 pm
18I’m not sure I understand your point.
A man who rapes a child is a pedophile and should be locked up, a person who downloads images of child pornography is inciting sex crimes against a child and should be locked up.
Someone who publishes violent adult pornography should do so within the laws of the country in which they publish, that means no one should sustain serious and lasting injury or should be coerced into doing anything they do not want to do. Despite what may be said that is generally the case, forced sex and serious violence are crimes all over the world and no one has been able to quote a single site where real (as opposed to faked) serious violence takes place.
Someone who downloads violent adult pornography is not inciting a crime and the evidence available says viewing such images will not cause the viewer to commit a crime.
The only other consideration, in the case of violent adult porn is to keep it out of the reach of children. As has been discussed censiorship will not work.
The proposed law of prosecuting those who download such images will not affect the avilability of the images online and may even increase the demand here for them.
The law mentioned in the first article will put downloading violent adult porn on the same basis as downloading child-porn. They are clearly different things, one is causing actual harm, the other is simply ‘bad taste’ and no one elses business.
The proposed law will divert already stretched resources from tracking child-pornography and lock people up for a ‘crime’ which causes no harm.
Mihaela Lica
March 13th, 2007 at 7:46 pm
19You are right about the laws, but we don’t see these people in the same light. For me anyone who harms a child or enjoys watching a child being harmed, is a monster. (I say “harm” and I mean sexual abuse!) Enyone who publishes such content is a monster too. You are kind to say “locked up”. I don’t want to say more.
About other “violent pornography”, as long as people are adults and responsible, as long as they don’t “expose” their preferences to children and they don’t harm others, I still think it is a matter of choice. What people consentually do behind closed doors is their business. This is why I support the idea of “password protected login”.
SteveMD
March 13th, 2007 at 7:51 pm
20P.S. I do think a campaign to get the government to subsidise filtering software such as ‘NetNanny’ and educate both parents and children about online dangers, would be far more helpful than any of the pro-censorship campaigns.
Mihaela Lica
March 13th, 2007 at 7:52 pm
21SteveMD
March 13th, 2007 at 7:58 pm
22I’m sorry if my posts have seems at odds to your viewpoint, my response was to the first article and the badly constructed law being proposed.
As for protecting children, I am all for any measure that can be shown to be effective (even if it ‘inconveniences’ adults who want to look at adult porn).
A password protection scheme would be an excellent idea (I would also suggest strong disclaimers on the sites front pages, but that is a minor matter) and I believe far easier to get international cooperation with than straightforward attempts at censorship of adult material.
Mihaela Lica
March 13th, 2007 at 8:03 pm
23Oh, now I understand! Yes, about the first article quoted… I agree. I just mentioned it to show that who really believes in something can make a difference. I simply admire Liz Longhurst’s power to fight for something she believes in. And I think… if one woman could do so much (even when the law is now a retrial), united people could do even more.
SteveMD
March 13th, 2007 at 8:04 pm
24I believe Gordon Brown is proposing a content standard classification scheme, similar to the BBFCs film classifications, that is being discussed in the EU.
This of course would only help if the law says those with an ‘adults only’ classification must have password protection. Any attempt at actual censorship throughout the EU would merely push the sites to other countries.
This would be law only in the EU, but if it were adopted then I see little problems in getting the USA and others to do something similar.
Mihaela Lica
March 13th, 2007 at 8:08 pm
25This is great news. Let’s hope that Gordon Brown reads blogs…
More interesting news come from WebProNews:
SteveMD
March 13th, 2007 at 9:53 pm
26Concerning your last post, it would seem that a central ‘age verification service’, based on something like a driving licence, could well be the answer.
No cost to adults (and so more acceptable to site owners) and a central service to give passwords for the ‘free sample’ areas of adult sites.
RSS feed for comments on this post
Leave a reply
previous post: Link Exchange Ups and Downs
next post: Blogger Power: Safeguard the Web for Children Launched
to top of page...